From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MyVA3-00041k-LO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:34:51 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MyV9z-000410-W1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:34:51 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37762 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MyV9z-00040s-Cv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:34:47 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.220.221]:39904)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MyV9w-0008Si-Fu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:34:46 -0400
Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so1486541fxm.9
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AD76B3C.3050001@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:34:36 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] Introduce qmisc module
References: <1255037747-3340-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>	<1255037747-3340-2-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>	<4AD72B88.2040107@codemonkey.ws>	<20091015122622.1f93ea2d@doriath>	<20091015163936.GB532@redhat.com>
	<20091015142837.6c90580a@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <20091015142837.6c90580a@doriath>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>  Not the right context but I was going to post about this soon, so
> I think this is a good opportunity to talk about it.
>
>  I didn't look at all available parsers from json.org, but this one:
>
> http://fara.cs.uni-potsdam.de/~jsg/json_parser/
>
>  Seems interesting.
>
>  Anthony, are you ok in using external implementations like that
> if they meet our requirements?
>   
If it's a library, it should be widely available (iow, packaged on all 
major distros) and there should be binaries available for Windows.

Otherwise, pulling the code into the tree isn't so bad provided that 
it's not huge.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori