From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mymwl-0007kS-QC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:34:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mymwh-0007fD-2g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:34:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33592 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mymwg-0007ev-Rg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:34:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7868) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mymwg-0006S9-H4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:34:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4AD87653.5030400@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:34:11 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1255453026-18637-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1255453026-18637-7-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1255561330.29192.2.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091015103405.591e2f3b@doriath> <1255626960.29192.7.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091015145208.1d871f09@doriath> <1255630433.29192.16.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091015160839.7dbef5bf@doriath> <4AD8211B.9090004@redhat.com> <20091016093910.6e4a1bca@doriath> In-Reply-To: <20091016093910.6e4a1bca@doriath> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/9] QError: Add qdev not found error List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Gerd Hoffmann , Hollis Blanchard , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/16/2009 02:39 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > That's a good question and to answer it properly I think we should > have to go over all errors and check if any of them generate > information which is not available from the context. As more communication (including errors) becomes asynchronous, the probability of this happening will quickly go to 1. I think we just need good QObject printf/scanf like functions. Paolo