From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MyyRP-0003Qo-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:50:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MyyRL-0003N7-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:50:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47347 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MyyRK-0003Mw-QX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:50:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f199.google.com ([209.85.221.199]:35276) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyyRK-0001xl-DL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:50:38 -0400 Received: by qyk37 with SMTP id 37so354589qyk.18 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AD922EB.5030501@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:50:35 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1255037747-3340-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1255037747-3340-2-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <4AD72B88.2040107@codemonkey.ws> <20091015122622.1f93ea2d@doriath> <20091015163936.GB532@redhat.com> <20091015142837.6c90580a@doriath> <4AD76B3C.3050001@codemonkey.ws> <4AD87424.3010000@redhat.com> <4AD87901.5030705@codemonkey.ws> <4AD8AECE.9000507@redhat.com> <4AD8AFA4.4070203@codemonkey.ws> <4AD8CB31.9080809@redhat.com> <4AD8E7B5.8000509@codemonkey.ws> <4AD910BA.4090607@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <4AD910BA.4090607@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/10] Introduce qmisc module List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 10/16/2009 11:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> I already am :-) Stay tuned, I should have a patch later this >> afternoon. > > Was it a race? (Seriously, sorry I didn't notice a couple of hours ago). > > This one is ~5% slower than the "Evil" one, but half the size. Tested > against the comments.json file from the "Evil" parser and with > valgrind too. Does all the funky Unicode stuff too. I haven't benchmarked mine. While yours came out an hour earlier, I included a full test suite, output QObjects, and support vararg parsing so I think I win :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori