From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mz67J-0000T1-O0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:02:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mz67E-0000Pr-Lc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:02:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57180 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mz67E-0000PS-D1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:02:24 -0400 Received: from cerberus.snarc.org ([212.85.155.21]:53380) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mz67B-0001zH-ML for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:02:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4AD995FD.6070202@snarc.org> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:01:33 +0100 From: Vincent Hanquez MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/10] Introduce qmisc module References: <1255037747-3340-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1255037747-3340-2-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <4AD72B88.2040107@codemonkey.ws> <20091015122622.1f93ea2d@doriath> <20091015163936.GB532@redhat.com> <20091015142837.6c90580a@doriath> <4AD76B3C.3050001@codemonkey.ws> <4AD87424.3010000@redhat.com> <4AD87901.5030705@codemonkey.ws> <4AD8AECE.9000507@redhat.com> <4AD8AFA4.4070203@codemonkey.ws> <4AD8CB31.9080809@redhat.com> <4AD8E7B5.8000509@codemonkey.ws> <4AD910BA.4090607@gnu.org> <4AD922EB.5030501@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4AD922EB.5030501@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino Anthony Liguori wrote: > Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 10/16/2009 11:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> >>> I already am :-) Stay tuned, I should have a patch later this >>> afternoon. >> >> Was it a race? (Seriously, sorry I didn't notice a couple of hours >> ago). >> >> This one is ~5% slower than the "Evil" one, but half the size. >> Tested against the comments.json file from the "Evil" parser and with >> valgrind too. Does all the funky Unicode stuff too. > > I haven't benchmarked mine. While yours came out an hour earlier, I > included a full test suite, output QObjects, and support vararg > parsing so I think I win :-) ar.. got mine too, i've been doing for the last 3 weeks slowly; it got a raw/pretty printer, an interruptible parser (on the same idea as JSON_parser.c), it's faster than JSON_parser.c [1], it's completely generic (more like a library than an embedded thing), fully JSON compliant (got a test suite too), support user supplied alloc functions, and callback for integer/float doesn't have their data converted automatically which means that the user of the library can use whatever it want to support the non-limited size JSON number (or just return errors for user that want the limit). the library by itself is 39K with -g last time i've looked. also the library comes with a jsonlint binary that's equivalent to xmllint (well formatting and verification). I'll package thing up and post a link to it on monday. -- Vincent