From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzWRL-00087p-Ic for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:08:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MzWRK-00087O-Tl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:08:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60291 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MzWRK-00087G-OP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:08:54 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.149]:27948) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MzWRK-0005Gh-CD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:08:54 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so2768859eyh.14 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4ADB2172.2040501@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:08:50 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/10] Introduce qmisc module References: <1255037747-3340-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1255037747-3340-2-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <4AD72B88.2040107@codemonkey.ws> <20091015122622.1f93ea2d@doriath> <20091015163936.GB532@redhat.com> <20091015142837.6c90580a@doriath> <4AD76B3C.3050001@codemonkey.ws> <4AD87424.3010000@redhat.com> <4AD87901.5030705@codemonkey.ws> <4AD8AECE.9000507@redhat.com> <4AD8AFA4.4070203@codemonkey.ws> <4AD8CB31.9080809@redhat.com> <4AD8E7B5.8000509@codemonkey.ws> <4AD910BA.4090607@gnu.org> <4AD922EB.5030501@codemonkey.ws> <4AD995FD.6070202@snarc.org> <20091018120631.0ab44d80@doriath> In-Reply-To: <20091018120631.0ab44d80@doriath> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Vincent Hanquez , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/18/2009 04:06 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > Integration with QObjects is a killer feature, I think it's the > stronger argument against grabbing one from the internet. Yeah, I'd say let's go with Anthony's stuff. I'll rebase the encoder on top of it soonish (I still think it's best if JSON encoding lies in QObject like a kind of toString). If we'll need the asynchronous parsing later, we can easily replace it with mine or Vincent's. Paolo