From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0WPD-0003XD-Ek for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:18:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0WP8-0003U7-Li for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:18:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35216 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N0WP8-0003U4-Gw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:18:46 -0400 Received: from mtagate6.de.ibm.com ([195.212.17.166]:32937) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0WP8-0007S0-3Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:18:46 -0400 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate6.de.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9L8If9S029005 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:18:41 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9L8IcUj3571796 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:18:41 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n9L8IcZa013675 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:18:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4ADEC3EA.6010901@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:18:50 +0200 From: Carsten Otte MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1255963059-10298-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4ADDE7E3.9090601@de.ibm.com> <8699EEC6-CD0A-4D56-8714-8F7D672670C1@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <8699EEC6-CD0A-4D56-8714-8F7D672670C1@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/9] S390x KVM support List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Carsten Otte , hare@suse.de, avi@redhat.com, qemu-devel Alexander Graf wrote: > Either we take the psw in on x86 too or we #ifdef out the x86 specific > stuff on s390. Good idea, I'll #ifndef CONFIG_S390 the x86 specifics while we're at it.