From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1PL4-0002KF-PF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:58:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1PL0-0002GI-TU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:58:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42008 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1PL0-0002G8-OU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:58:10 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:58317) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1PL0-00087E-5o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:58:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4AE1FCBD.8030904@mail.berlios.de> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:58:05 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] tcg, tci: Add TCG and interpreter for bytecode (virtual machine) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: TeLeMan Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org TeLeMan schrieb: > Tested i386-softmmu only. Now tci can run windows xp sp2 and its speed > is about 6 times slower than jit. > -- > SUN OF A BEACH Great. Many thanks for the fixes, enhancements and for the testing, too. Is patch 4 (call handling) needed, or is it an optimization? If it is needed, the tcg disassembler has to be extended as well. And did patch 5 (inline) speed up the code? I had expected that static functions don't need inline, because the compiler can optimize them anyway. Regards, Stefan