From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5Llg-0001Xd-Dl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:58:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5Llb-0001WW-HU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:58:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38916 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5Llb-0001WT-EG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:57:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3898) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5Lla-0008E9-Tm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:57:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4AF052F0.4030505@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:57:36 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1257199759-2941-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4AEFCBED.50804@redhat.com> <4AEFCCBA.9050408@redhat.com> <8BA1853F-11C9-44B1-9FDB-1DFDAED40E1B@suse.de> <4AEFCEDA.4030308@redhat.com> <87F51670-CB3F-431C-87B4-A8746F996C6F@suse.de> <4AEFDF35.3020806@redhat.com> <8EA2855E-4209-4CCA-9E87-1D652A72F8FE@suse.de> <4AEFE7DA.30105@redhat.com> <4AEFEF71.5010105@redhat.com> <4AF048E1.90408@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4AF048E1.90408@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add VirtIO Frame Buffer Support List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Alexander Graf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/03/2009 05:14 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 11/03/2009 10:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> Exactly. In fact, I'm even scared to reboot mine because I might end >>> up in a 3270 terminal. The whole text only crap keeps people from >>> using this platform! And that's what I want to change here. >> >> Ok. I oppose paravirtualization for its own sake and only support it >> if there's no other way to get performance. In this case it buys us >> basic functionality which is surprisingly missing on native, that's >> arguably even more important. > > There is no "native" on s390. Everything is "paravirtual". I meant native as in "what they usually do without our stuff". -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function