From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7XIl-0005Ws-GX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:41:11 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7XIg-0005Uy-DS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:41:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34764 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7XIe-0005Uh-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:41:05 -0500 Received: from mail-px0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:43749) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7XIe-0005rh-7a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:41:04 -0500 Received: by pxi33 with SMTP id 33so174513pxi.4 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:41:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AF8461A.1040602@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:40:58 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] port over extboot from kvm References: <1252401463-3249-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <4AA66730.7040901@codemonkey.ws> <200911091606.09783.paul@codesourcery.com> <4AF843E7.50700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4AF843E7.50700@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Paul Brook , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 11/09/09 17:06, Paul Brook wrote: >> On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>>> $subject says pretty much everything. >>>> >>>> extboot.[cS] are a straight copy from the kvm tree. The windup in >>>> vl,c >>>> and hw/pc.c is done slightly different, I've added a function to >>>> lookup >>>> the boot drive instead of adding a new global variable. >>> >>> I think the function here is high even if the implementation is ugly. >>> In the past, Paul strongly objected to this. Paul, care to comment? >> >> Doesn't gpxe support virtio-blk, without requiring any additional qemu >> "features"? > > As far I know patches exist but where never merged. > Also there is no way to boot from scsi+usb ... I think Kevin mentioned he would likely to usb boot support for SeaBIOS. Adding virtio-blk support to SeaBIOS would also be pretty reasonable. SCSI is a bit more tough. Doing an LSI driver in SeaBIOS would be a bit tougher. Regards, Anthony Liguori