From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF888CE.4000502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580911091238g77ef4b4ah2a7b7684adbac0aa@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/09/09 21:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> As Michael notes, devices have physical address sizes independent of the
>> target platform; a PCI device that supports 64-bit addresses can be plugged
>> into a motherboard that supports 32-bit address bus processors.
>
> True. But I think the solution is not to make all buses maximum width,
> but support multiple buses with width translation in between.
I suspect translating between 32 and 64 bit is more complex and more
overhead than simply using 64bit all the time.
> We could improve the compilation system so that on 64 bit hosts the
> benefit of single size target_phys_addr_t results in compiling the
> files only once.
I think this is already the case. When building on x86_64 host (both
32bit and 64bit targets) I find the libhw32 directory empty ...
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-06 23:09 [Qemu-devel] [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-07 15:22 ` Blue Swirl
2009-11-09 9:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 12:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 13:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 13:17 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 13:39 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 13:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 20:38 ` Blue Swirl
2009-11-09 21:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2009-11-11 4:06 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-11 9:41 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 14:13 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-11 15:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 16:38 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-16 16:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 18:53 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-16 21:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-24 11:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-24 13:51 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-25 16:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 7:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 8:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 10:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 11:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 11:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 14:21 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 14:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 14:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 15:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-27 11:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-02 13:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-07 8:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-12-07 8:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 19:08 ` Ryan Harper
2009-11-16 20:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 21:45 ` Ryan Harper
2009-11-11 11:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 11:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-11 13:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 13:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-11 14:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-12 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF888CE.4000502@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).