From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:02:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFAB5F8.50209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFAA58B.6090907@suse.de>
On 11/11/09 12:52, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I still don't quite agree with the new scsi callback, which has
> just the SCSIRequest as an argument. So when supporting more command
> queueing we have no idea to which (internal) request structure
> the SCSIRequest belongs, and still have to do a lookup.
> Which is painful. Can we have a second 'void *arg' argument
> to the callback which will allow us some driver specific
> pointer?
How about sticking a 'void *hba_private' element into SCSIRequest instead?
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-06 23:09 [Qemu-devel] [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-07 15:22 ` Blue Swirl
2009-11-09 9:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 12:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 13:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 13:17 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 13:39 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 13:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 20:38 ` Blue Swirl
2009-11-09 21:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 4:06 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-11 9:41 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 14:13 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-11 15:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 16:38 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-16 16:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 18:53 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-16 21:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-24 11:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-24 13:51 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-25 16:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 7:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 8:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 10:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 11:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 11:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 14:21 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 14:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 14:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 15:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-27 11:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-02 13:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-07 8:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-12-07 8:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 19:08 ` Ryan Harper
2009-11-16 20:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 21:45 ` Ryan Harper
2009-11-11 11:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 11:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-11 13:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2009-11-11 13:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-11 14:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-12 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFAB5F8.50209@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).