From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NA8Ng-0002Xp-Qz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:41:00 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NA8Nb-0002Py-VJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:41:00 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43765 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NA8Nb-0002Pn-Re
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:40:55 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59577)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1NA8Nb-0003Rk-EF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:40:55 -0500
Message-ID: <4B01B8CA.5020205@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:40:42 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul
References: <4AF4ACA5.2090701@redhat.com>
	<200911111413.09320.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4AFAD7A8.70707@redhat.com>
	<200911111638.31288.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4B017F46.4030700@redhat.com> <20091116190823.GR11154@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091116190823.GR11154@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

   Hi,

>> Suggestions for other guests which might be sensitive to changes like
>> this?  Maybe even some which don't work with the current lsi emulation?
>
> XP 64-bit, 2k3 32/64, 2k8 32/64
>
> 64-bit is important because the DMA mode of the lsi driver is different
> when the 64-bit versions of the win drivers.

Are these in the "needs regression testing" or in the "known broken" group?

thanks,
   Gerd