From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] extboot reloaded.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:14:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B01C0B9.8060507@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B01B419.50905@redhat.com>
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 11/16/09 20:24, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> If we were going to introduce a light weight block protocol like this,
>> I'd rather it be implemented in SeaBIOS as a block driver.
>
> Ok. That would mean to replace the option rom with a seabios patch.
> The qemu code will be unmodified though (except for the rom loading).
Yup.
>> and requires no special options on the
>> command line.
>>
>> It would require a mechanism to do enumeration and identification
>> though.
>
> Huh? Do you want export *all* block devices via extboot? Will IDE
> drives show up twice then?
No, because SeaBIOS already has an ATA driver so we wouldn't want to
expose IDE on the extboot bus.
> I would export only one and export it only on explicit user request,
> so it can be used for cases where seabios has no native support ...
If we expose all of the disks, then the user can choose which one they
want to boot from without having to shut down qemu and modify the
command line.
It's not obvious to me how we could control the position in the IPL
table of each disk though. I guess we could have a priority parameter
that was part of the disk enumeration that controlled how each device
was added in the table. Do you have any thoughts Kevin?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-16 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 18:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] extboot reloaded Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 18:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] extboot: add option rom Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 18:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] extboot: qemu code Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 19:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] extboot reloaded Anthony Liguori
2009-11-16 20:20 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 21:14 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-11-17 11:36 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-17 12:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-17 12:36 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-17 13:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-17 13:35 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-17 14:23 ` Alexander Graf
2009-11-17 14:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-11-18 4:34 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-18 14:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-11-19 1:27 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-16 22:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-16 22:55 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B01C0B9.8060507@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).