From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ND1N1-0000iQ-5w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:48:15 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ND1Mw-0000fg-Hx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:48:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49483 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ND1Mw-0000fS-90 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:48:10 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f212.google.com ([209.85.218.212]:55088) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ND1Mv-0008Ti-7a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:48:09 -0500 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so8399625bwz.2 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:48:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B0C3870.3010203@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:48:00 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/13] Implement early printk in virtio-console References: <1259083781-14642-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1259083781-14642-11-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4B0C2C24.9060107@codemonkey.ws> <486F7673-73A4-4983-9ACC-3C45BB73BF59@suse.de> <4B0C332E.7020408@codemonkey.ws> <158A814D-A4BB-4F3C-BFC6-8470FB559A1F@suse.de> <4B0C3440.7080406@codemonkey.ws> <06578E67-B7AD-4217-B9F0-FDA753E35412@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <06578E67-B7AD-4217-B9F0-FDA753E35412@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Carsten Otte , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno Alexander Graf wrote: >> Oh, that's bad :-) >> >> That should really be it's own character device. We don't really have a way to connect two character devices like that. >> Maybe muxing? >> > > So you want me to implement char muxing and a bootloader within a week? :) > Char muxing is already there. Don't know what to do about the bootloader bit. At this point, I'm curious about whether kboot would be a viable solution. > Alex Regards, Anthony Liguori