From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFOmX-0004Ok-8B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:12:25 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFOmS-0004NM-Gd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:12:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55576 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFOmS-0004NF-BI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:12:20 -0500 Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.163]:57817) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFOmS-0005iD-0c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:12:20 -0500 Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate3.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nB19CCS2011993 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:12 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nB19CBiA577628 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:11 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id nB19CBHK026331 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:12:11 GMT Message-ID: <4B14DE12.5060100@de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:12:50 +0100 From: Carsten Otte MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] Allocate physical memory in low virtual address space References: <1259241800-2810-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1259241800-2810-6-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20091130181843.GA26620@volta.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Carsten Otte , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno Alexander Graf wrote: > For the technical reason I hope Carsten can provide some insight. > As for the implementation reason - S390 KVM (the kernel part) doesn't do memslots properly :-). I'm sorry, I cannot comment on that :-(.