From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:51:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1565AD.10503@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D2A964B8-EC17-4F48-B778-5A6E1F205E3C@suse.de>
Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible
> for PPC?
>
> Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to
> increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC
> Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc.
>
> There are some subsystems where nobody feels responsible though,
> apparently hoping 'someone else' will tske on it. Well, turns out it
> doesn't work that way.
The general problem is that someone has to step up to maintain these
subsystems. For some of them, there just isn't really a lot of interest.
> So could we please assign a committer for every subsystem around? Even
> if the committer doesn't know the architecture inside out, it's still
> valuable to have soneone feel responsible at all. Committer and
> maintainer also don't have to be the same person. I'll gladly maintain
> S390 without having commit rights - as long as I have someone to CC
> and know the patches will get merged.
git pulls have been working really well for linux-user. I'd like to
continue that for new architectures.
> Of course, my main unclear subsystems are PPC and S390.
>
> I'd recommend the following committers:
>
> PPC: Blue Swirl
> S390: Aurelien
>
> If you have other subsystems you feel uncertain on responsibilities,
> please add them to the list incl. committer recommendation.
PPC is tough because we lost our previous maintainer. It's generally in
pretty bad shape. No one really has stepped up to seriously improve it
either.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-01 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 11:47 [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation Alexander Graf
2009-12-01 18:51 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-12-01 19:21 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-01 21:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-01 22:49 ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02 11:18 ` andrzej zaborowski
2009-12-02 11:24 ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02 12:38 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-02 11:31 ` Riku Voipio
2009-12-03 14:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-02 8:26 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-12-02 8:37 ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02 8:46 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-12-02 8:54 ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-02 21:09 ` Jan-Simon Möller
2009-12-02 9:08 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-02 8:45 ` malc
2009-12-02 15:33 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-02 18:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-12-02 18:48 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-03 10:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-03 13:10 ` andrzej zaborowski
2009-12-02 21:18 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-03 10:07 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-02 18:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-12-02 18:53 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-02 18:56 ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-03 9:44 ` Filip Navara
2009-12-03 14:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-02 19:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-03 9:20 ` Riku Voipio
2009-12-03 12:56 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-12-03 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-05 0:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Isaku Yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B1565AD.10503@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).