From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFoTr-0007hu-Tu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:38:51 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFoTn-0007fD-Bx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:38:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46465 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFoTn-0007f5-4z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:38:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3099) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFoTm-0007La-PV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:38:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4B165FD1.60501@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:38:41 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation References: <4B1565AD.10503@codemonkey.ws> <98EAB3C5-2581-43CE-A64D-1699D164FFCE@suse.de> <4B164E87.7070607@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4B164E87.7070607@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/02/2009 01:24 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> If it leads to removing the subsystem then it's not much gain for the >> project and the users :) >> >> I don't know of any succesful project that has maintainers who don't >> feel responsible for the code they're comming. >> >> > Well the point I was trying to make is that committer != maintainer. Avi > commits PPC/S390 kvm stuff all the time without knowing the > architectures inside out ;). > I always make a point of getting acks (or the patch itself) from someone who does. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function