From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFucx-0001lZ-H8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:12:39 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFucs-0001fI-AD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:12:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46775 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFucs-0001f2-1x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:12:34 -0500 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.147]:22198) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFucr-0001YN-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:12:34 -0500 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so90271qwc.4 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:12:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B16BC1E.5050505@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:12:30 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation References: <4B16B483.6070605@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Artyom Tarasenko Cc: Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > I thought attaching a second copy were the way to send the patch properly. > Attaching as an application/octet-stream is not terribly helpful. It basically means you've attached a binary blob. > Is the proper way described somewhere? > The proper way is to use a mailer that isn't broken. Attaching everything as "application/octet-stream" is broken. Regards, Anthony Liguori