From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NFvCD-00061V-54
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:49:05 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NFvC8-0005zb-NE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:49:04 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41140 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFvC8-0005zL-DJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:49:00 -0500
Received: from mail-pw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:36475)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NFvC8-0005n6-4g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:49:00 -0500
Received: by pwi12 with SMTP id 12so405867pwi.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:48:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B16C4A5.7000803@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:48:53 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging update (0.12 pending freeze)
References: <4B1699D3.8010908@codemonkey.ws> <4B16C421.2090507@collabora.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4B16C421.2090507@collabora.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Ian Molton <ian.molton@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Ian Molton wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> I've got all of the patches I'm considering for 0.12 currently in
>> staging.
>>     
>
>   
>> http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git
>>     
>
> I see you have my rng and size patches in there, thanks for the quick
> review!
>
> Is it too late to get the timer based socket reconnect patch in and the
> (two liner) patch to virtio-rng to use it? it'd make virtio-rng actually
> useful in a production environment...
>   

Actually, that patch would break a production environment.  You cannot 
sleep in qemu.  It will severely impact the guest.

> if not, let me know and I'll rebase and send an incremental patchset to you.
>   

Regards,

Anthony Liguori