From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFvHR-0000XK-ST for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:54:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFvHN-0000Td-2A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:54:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44680 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFvHM-0000TL-NU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:54:24 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f194.google.com ([209.85.221.194]:52414) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFvHM-0006Nb-GP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:54:24 -0500 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so220711qyk.4 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:54:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B16C5EC.4080704@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:54:20 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging update (0.12 pending freeze) References: <4B1699D3.8010908@codemonkey.ws> <20091202174405.6b14319e@doriath> In-Reply-To: <20091202174405.6b14319e@doriath> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:46:11 -0600 > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> I've got all of the patches I'm considering for 0.12 currently in >> staging. I'm going to work through and test/commit these in a few >> chunks over the next few days before freezing the tree. >> >> If you have a pending patch that you think should be in 0.12, please >> check to make sure it's there. If you have a new patch you'd like to >> consider for 0.12, please indicate that in the subject with a [FOR 0.12] >> tag as I don't plan on doing another full pull of patches (since testing >> takes time). >> > > My conversion series is not there: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-11/msg01398.html > I'm not sure why they aren't there, but can you rebase that against staging? Specifically, Jan's block migration info patches introduce new fields. Regards, Anthony Liguori