From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFwbF-0007eP-HE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:19:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFwbA-0007cN-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:19:01 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33181 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFwbA-0007cK-Ib for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:18:56 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f188.google.com ([209.85.210.188]:60094) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFwbA-0005O7-Ca for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:18:56 -0500 Received: by yxe26 with SMTP id 26so588160yxe.4 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:18:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B16D9BB.5010902@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:18:51 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation References: <4B16B29C.40104@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4B16B29C.40104@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Artyom Tarasenko Jan Kiszka wrote: > Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > >> 2009/12/1 Alexander Graf : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for >>> PPC? >>> >>> Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to >>> increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC >>> Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc. >>> >> And who can increase chances of getting committed for a scsi-related patch? >> I sent a patch on November, the 10th (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/38100/), >> and it looks like it was just ignored. >> >> > > Patch is line-wrapped (following your link to patchwork makes this obvious). > > Note that the merge process can be quite silent. Actually, I provided this feedback for the first submission. He resubmitted again with the same issue. Regards, Anthony Liguori