From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGAzO-0005jP-MU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:40:54 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGAzJ-0005d1-Df for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:40:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46538 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGAzJ-0005cn-5o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:40:49 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10864) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGAzI-0001PI-Mm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:40:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4B17B1C4.80208@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:40:36 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/11] remove smp restriction from kvm References: <1259761702-4041-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1259761702-4041-7-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1259761702-4041-8-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1259761702-4041-9-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1259761702-4041-10-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1259761702-4041-11-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1259761702-4041-12-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4B17ADBD.4070108@redhat.com> <5d6222a80912030436o6e91d858hfd7a4df6f7930d5e@mail.gmail.com> <4B17B10A.1070801@redhat.com> <5d6222a80912030439i79eba707h424efce964dec7d3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80912030439i79eba707h424efce964dec7d3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: Glauber Costa , aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/03/2009 02:39 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> This works well in qemu-kvm. What's the reason? it may indicate a bug in >> up. >> > The reason is that we do not handle SIPI in qemu.git yet. Now that the basics > of smp are working, it should not be too difficult to get it working. > OK. I think this is worthwhile. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function