From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGYAH-0005Zo-Mv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:25:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGYAA-0005Xk-DR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:25:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33452 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGYA8-0005XM-Dn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:25:32 -0500 Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:20963) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGYA8-00014W-3l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:25:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4B190DC8.60005@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:25:28 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B17DB29.9060801@siemens.com> <4B181033.1020804@siemens.com> <4B18C176.7050105@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B18C176.7050105@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Bugs in kvm guest migration List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel , kvm Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/03/2009 09:23 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> Problem 2 >>> --------- >>> Setup: qemu head with vmstate fixes. kvm-kmod master, 64-bit host& guest. >>> Effect: The migration target either locks up or reboots immediately. >>> I've nailed this down to 84d0b66c778d881eafca2a5d0d66678211c4e861. Every >>> kvm module build before that works, everything including and after >>> 26ede77f536d1bb369527a96c7fe7fdc8ba2f890 shows the effect (everything in >>> between crashes the host for known reasons). It's still unclear if this >>> is an kvm-kmod wrapping issue of the user-space return notifiers. Will >>> check once problem #1 is understood. >>> >> It is kernel-related, using kvm.git as host kernel makes no difference. >> >> This may now mean that kvm is buggy or that it triggers some msr >> save/restore related issues in qemu. Digging even deeper... >> > > Does calling drop_user_return_notifiers() (static in x86.c, will need > exporting) in vmx_load_host_state() within the preempt-disable region help? > Nope. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux