From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHgXB-0008Cn-CB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:34:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHgX4-0008BZ-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:33:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58297 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHgX3-0008BI-Ed for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:33:53 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:44361) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NHgX3-0008Df-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:33:53 -0500 Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nB7GVR1U006759 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:31:27 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nB7GXpZq134788 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:33:51 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nB7GXnuM016684 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:33:49 -0200 Message-ID: <4B1D2E6B.30104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:33:47 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: Fix initial kvm_has_msr_star References: <4B1BC4EC.90704@web.de> <4B1CB903.9000900@redhat.com> <4B1D1571.7050906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4B1D2DF6.3070405@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1D2DF6.3070405@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/07/2009 04:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Don't know when 0.11.2 will happen but I'll also push it to the >> stable-0.11 branch. >> > > I think this is worthy of a 0.11.2 all by itself. Understood. I'll see what I can do today. -- Regards, Anthony Liguori