From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NHh3j-00086g-F5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:07:39 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NHh3d-000845-Pd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:07:38 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54910 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHh3d-00083u-5s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:07:33 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37214)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1NHh3d-0003ME-8m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:07:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4B1D363A.5020200@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:07:06 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Permit zero-sized qemu_malloc() & friends
References: <m3skbwxgkp.fsf@crossbow.pond.sub.org>
	<4B1D2462.3070000@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D2696.5080003@redhat.com>
	<4B1D27EE.7060400@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D292D.4010700@redhat.com>
	<4B1D2B54.40402@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D2CC2.7010806@redhat.com>
	<4B1D2E2E.6060907@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D2F38.1040604@redhat.com>
	<4B1D347A.3030102@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4B1D347A.3030102@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 12/07/2009 06:59 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> What about developers that hit the assert?  Do they send patches that 
>> fix code that works in production just so they can run in developer 
>> mode?
>
> Sounds like a good way to get developers to help convert from 
> qemu_malloc() to qemu_new*() :-)
>

In 0.12?

My objection was to different behaviour of 0.12 in dev and production modes.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function