From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHhDY-0002Bd-9M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:17:48 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHhDS-00022t-ED for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:17:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45390 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHhDS-00022U-3S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:17:42 -0500 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.150]:35013) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NHhDS-0004Yj-GZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:17:42 -0500 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 14so638190qwa.4 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:17:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1D38B1.7040705@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:17:37 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Permit zero-sized qemu_malloc() & friends References: <4B1D2462.3070000@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D2696.5080003@redhat.com> <4B1D27EE.7060400@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D292D.4010700@redhat.com> <4B1D2B54.40402@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D2CC2.7010806@redhat.com> <4B1D2E2E.6060907@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D2F38.1040604@redhat.com> <4B1D347A.3030102@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D363A.5020200@redhat.com> <4B1D36BE.9020801@codemonkey.ws> <4B1D37D2.3010707@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1D37D2.3010707@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Kevin Wolf , Paul Brook , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Avi Kivity wrote: > I don't understand. People will develop patches for 0.12 for a while > as bugs are reported and fixed. What's the exact problem here? Regards, Anthony Liguori