qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Endless loop in qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:51:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1E67F3.2030100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B1D1882.7040404@redhat.com>

Am 07.12.2009 16:00, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 07.12.2009 15:16, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>>> Likely not. What I did was nothing special, and I did not noticed such a
>>> crash in the last months.
>>
>> And now it happened again (qemu-kvm head, during kernel installation
>> from network onto local qcow2-disk). Any clever idea how to proceed with
>> this?
> 
> I still haven't seen this and I still have no theory on what could be
> happening here. I'm just trying to write down what I think must happen
> to get into this situation. Maybe you can point at something I'm missing
> or maybe it helps you to have a sudden inspiration.
> 
> The crash happens because we have a loop in the s->cluster_allocs list.
> A loop can only be created by inserting an object twice. The only insert
> to this list happens in qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset (though an earlier
> call than that of the stack trace).
> 
> There is only one relevant caller of this function, qcow_aio_write_cb.
> Part of it is a call to run_dependent_requests which removes the request
> from s->cluster_allocs. So after the QLIST_REMOVE in
> run_dependent_requests the request can't be contained in the list, but
> at the call of qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset it must be contained again. It
> must be added somewhere in between these two calls.
> 
> In qcow_aio_write_cb there isn't much happening between these calls. The
> only thing that could somehow become dangerous is the
> qcow_aio_write_cb(req, 0); for queued requests in run_dependent_requests.

Hm, you're using only one disk, and it's an IDE disk, right? Then the
queue of dependent requests should be empty anyway, so no dangerous
calls here. Maybe your theory of a memory corruption is the better one.

Kevin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-08 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-19 12:19 [Qemu-devel] Endless loop in qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset Jan Kiszka
2009-11-19 14:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2009-11-19 14:58   ` Jan Kiszka
2009-12-07 14:16     ` Jan Kiszka
2009-12-07 14:50       ` Jan Kiszka
2009-12-07 15:03         ` Kevin Wolf
2009-12-07 15:25           ` Jan Kiszka
2009-12-07 15:04         ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-07 15:00       ` Kevin Wolf
2009-12-07 16:09         ` Jan Kiszka
2009-12-07 16:26           ` Kevin Wolf
2009-12-08 14:51         ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2010-05-07  1:19 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-05-07  7:37   ` Kevin Wolf
2010-05-07 15:16     ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B1E67F3.2030100@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).