From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NIhvy-0004ZF-Rq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:15:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NIhvt-0004Tm-NK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:15:49 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41232 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NIhvt-0004Tc-CV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:15:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21807) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NIhvt-0002UB-9L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:15:45 -0500 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBACFhAm022288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:15:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4B20E66B.7090509@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:15:39 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1260439868-15061-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <20091210120315.GA13657@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20091210120315.GA13657@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [FOR 0.12 PATCH 0/4] misc bugfixes List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/10/09 13:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:11:04AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A bunch of fixes for various bugs, mostly hotplug stuff found by Daniel. >> >> please apply, >> Gerd >> > > I am kind of confused by the FOR 0.12 prefix - these > patches are not on master yet, are they? No. > Should patches land on master before being backported > to 0.12? Anthony asked to tag patches this way if they should be merged for the 0.12 release. So, after branching, they should go to both master and 0.12 I think. Do we have a 0.12 branch already? cheers, Gerd