From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ8z0-0002E9-AZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:08:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ8yv-0002C1-8M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:08:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46015 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ8yu-0002Bw-Qf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:08:40 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:47647) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJ8yp-0005nV-OO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:08:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4B227C7E.3090807@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:08:14 -0700 From: "David S. Ahern" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Qemu terminating with SIGABRT List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel I realize this is a rather generic question, but what are typical reasons Qemu would be killed by a SIGABRT? I am seeing this on a somewhat regular (though not repeatable on demand) basis. I do not have a core file, though I hope to capture one if I can get it repeat again. Thanks, -- David Ahern