From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ9IE-0004rN-64 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:28:38 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ9I5-0004m7-Fp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:28:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58989 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ9I4-0004lw-Cf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:28:28 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f197.google.com ([209.85.223.197]:50698) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJ9I4-0007dX-3h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:28:28 -0500 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so633783iwn.4 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:28:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B228137.6040300@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:28:23 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open References: <1952371992.1569421260550935967.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4B227E78.2050709@codemonkey.ws> <2AE62D60-996F-497A-8453-F6B239E3CC80@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <2AE62D60-996F-497A-8453-F6B239E3CC80@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Yaniv Kamay , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jun Koi Alexander Graf wrote: > On 11.12.2009, at 18:16, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> Yaniv Kamay wrote: >> >>>> It already has. It's not a git tree with staged patches. It's a tarball release of a really old version of kvm-userspace that's called >>>> >>>> 'vdesktop'. >>>> >>>> >>> This guy is evil and he is motivate by personal agenda. I hope you all will >>> wakeup. >>> >>> >> Okay, I'm done with this thread. I hope you have better luck in the future with Spice. >> > > C'mon. You know better than to be that easily offended, right? > This is clearly not a productive discussion so I don't see the point in continuing it (and yes, I know I just did ;-)). Regards, Anthony Liguori