From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKBol-0007qA-6M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:22:31 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKBog-0007mS-8l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:22:30 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49103 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKBog-0007mC-2B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:22:26 -0500
Received: from mail-gx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.217.222]:37967)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NKBob-0001vv-P9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:22:22 -0500
Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22so3215723gxk.17
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B264A14.1000802@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:22:12 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?
References: <4B260683.8000506@redhat.com> <20091214093414.GA30459@redhat.com>
	<4B26090B.8010707@redhat.com> <20091214094406.GB32140@redhat.com>
	<4B261082.4030806@redhat.com> <20091214105912.GA32355@redhat.com>
	<1913984B-EF3F-4974-830A-DF97B8410AA6@suse.de>
	<20091214132423.GB973@redhat.com> <4B263F23.2090601@suse.de>
	<4B2647AF.1030605@codemonkey.ws> <20091214141143.GA1360@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091214141143.GA1360@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "glommer@redhat.com" <glommer@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Well I am pretty sure that I used virtio + e1000 with 0.11
> and apparently I can't now.
> So it does look like a regression to me ...
>   

That's what I said, we should make sure that we stop loading roms when 
we run out of room as opposed to trampling over the bios space.

But let's not try to solve the problem of fitting more roms into the 
space than we can.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori