From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKHxo-0003oJ-OI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:56:16 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKHxk-0003mB-AX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:56:16 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39805 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKHxk-0003m6-1F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:56:12 -0500
Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.211.171]:61985)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NKHxj-0002tr-Mo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:56:11 -0500
Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so3192674ywh.18
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:56:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B26A667.2020301@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:56:07 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?
References: <4B2647AF.1030605@codemonkey.ws> <20091214141143.GA1360@redhat.com>
	<20091214141341.GB1360@redhat.com> <4B264AF1.6060802@codemonkey.ws>
	<7FB8DD1225E54176BCAF5523B6AEA89B@FSCPC>
	<4B26931E.4000101@codemonkey.ws> <20091214194210.GB6150@redhat.com>
	<4B269933.3010906@codemonkey.ws> <20091214202019.GF6150@redhat.com>
	<4B26A0DE.5000304@redhat.com> <20091214203428.GI6150@redhat.com>
	<D50E43944FFE4B9A86FB5C411519F78D@FSCPC>
In-Reply-To: <D50E43944FFE4B9A86FB5C411519F78D@FSCPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
> Some DOS-based software might need the UMA (RAM UMB).

I don't think that's the workload to optimize for in terms of the 
default settings.  Certainly, it's important to allow such workloads to 
disable all unnecessary rom loading but I don't think it's justification 
for default settings.

> - Sebastian
>

Regards,

Anthony Liguori