From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKfaF-0002hN-MQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:09:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKfaA-0002cs-7o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:09:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44701 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKfaA-0002cp-0o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:09:26 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:51041) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKfa9-0006Ve-Q9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:09:26 -0500 Message-ID: <4B28090C.5070901@mail.berlios.de> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:09:16 +0100 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] A different way to ask for readonly drive References: <4B263F0B.90408@redhat.com> <4B265F7D.1010109@mail.berlios.de> <20091215184501.GB21298@shareable.org> In-Reply-To: <20091215184501.GB21298@shareable.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Naphtali Sprei , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jamie Lokier schrieb: > Stefan Weil wrote: > >> So here are my suggestions: >> >> read_write=rw >> read_write=ro >> read_write=rw-ro >> >> or >> >> access=rw >> access=ro >> access=rw-ro >> > > Mine: > > access=rw > access=ro > access=auto (default) > > -- Jamie Looks good. Best suggestion up to now (in my personal opinion). -- Stefan