From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKqnh-0005aR-QK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:08:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKqnd-0005ZL-Pi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:08:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42924 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKqnd-0005ZC-J8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:08:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21918) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKqnd-0004XO-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:08:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4B28B173.7060709@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:07:47 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] i386 emulation bug: mov reg, [addr] References: <200912151948.53307.ck@iseclab.org> <20091215212657.GC26319@shareable.org> In-Reply-To: <20091215212657.GC26319@shareable.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Clemens Kolbitsch , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/15/2009 11:26 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > When is REX_X(s) not zero, and does it break the index != 4 test? > > Some rex bits do affect these tests, and some don't. It's the usual 'consistently inconsistent' rules of x86. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function