[Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Anthony Liguori]

I haven't built/tested at all, but this is the set of patches I've 
collected for the 0.12.0 release.  Will be testing tonight and tomorrow 
and tagging probably around 5pm CST.  Will then upload the release and 
announce once things are propagated.

If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for 
0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.

http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git stable-0.12

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Markus Armbruster]

Commit 731b9ff6 is correct, but commit 24598d23 is more general, and it
comes first.  Drop it the former?

"Nice to have" commit log corrections:

* 92375e10 qdev: Improve uni-north device names (was: [Qemu-devel] [FOR 0.12 PATCH] qdev: Replace device names containing whitespace)

  The (was: ...) part is ugly.  My fault.  Would be nice to strip it.

* 249dbde8 fix vga names in default_list

  Body of commit message is factually incorrect.  It says:

    markus has changed vga names recently and forgot to adapt default_list.
    
  The commit fixes up commit 64465297, which went in *after* the name
  change in commit 556cd098.  So it's technically a mismerge.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Anthony Liguori]

Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Commit 731b9ff6 is correct, but commit 24598d23 is more general, and it
> comes first.  Drop it the former?
>
> "Nice to have" commit log corrections:
>
> * 92375e10 qdev: Improve uni-north device names (was: [Qemu-devel] [FOR 0.12 PATCH] qdev: Replace device names containing whitespace)
>
>   The (was: ...) part is ugly.  My fault.  Would be nice to strip it.
>
> * 249dbde8 fix vga names in default_list
>
>   Body of commit message is factually incorrect.  It says:
>
>     markus has changed vga names recently and forgot to adapt default_list.
>     
>   The commit fixes up commit 64465297, which went in *after* the name
>   change in commit 556cd098.  So it's technically a mismerge.
>   

Heh, sure, I can update those logs.

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

[Qemu-devel] Re: Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Jan Kiszka]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I haven't built/tested at all, but this is the set of patches I've
> collected for the 0.12.0 release.  Will be testing tonight and tomorrow
> and tagging probably around 5pm CST.  Will then upload the release and
> announce once things are propagated.
> 
> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.
> 
> http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git stable-0.12
> 

Please don't forget to revert ebbc8a3d8e76d0402f8a08c10c0f32e24715d41d,
it was obsoleted by d1793b836f8f123b961c613de1bb1c0c185c84cc and now
saves/restores a useless field.

And http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/58257 would be
nice to have.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]

[Qemu-devel] Re: Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Anthony Liguori]

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> I haven't built/tested at all, but this is the set of patches I've
>> collected for the 0.12.0 release.  Will be testing tonight and tomorrow
>> and tagging probably around 5pm CST.  Will then upload the release and
>> announce once things are propagated.
>>
>> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
>> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.
>>
>> http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git stable-0.12
>>
>>     
>
> Please don't forget to revert ebbc8a3d8e76d0402f8a08c10c0f32e24715d41d,
> it was obsoleted by d1793b836f8f123b961c613de1bb1c0c185c84cc and now
> saves/restores a useless field.
>
> And http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/58257 would be
> nice to have.
>   

Picked up both of these.  Thanks.

> Jan
>
>   


-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Gerd Hoffmann]

   Hi,

> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/40546/

is missing.

cheers,
   Gerd

Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Anthony Liguori]

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
>
>> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
>> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/40546/
>
> is missing.

Picked this up, thanks.

> cheers,
>   Gerd


-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Gerd Hoffmann]

   Hi,

> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.

Also missing:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/41172/

cheers,
   Gerd

Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Gerd Hoffmann]

On 12/18/09 10:06, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
>
>> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
>> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.
>
> Also missing:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/41172/

Oops, false alarm.  That one is in.
/me was looking at the wrong branch ...

sorry,
   Gerd

Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Anthony Liguori]

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
>
>> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
>> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.
>
> Also missing:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/41172/

Had that one.  Did you copy/paste the wrong url or just miss it in staging?

commit b8df9d2559a92430c27e7a6060e739ada40ea427
Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Dec 15 10:20:57 2009 +0100

    usb-net: use qdev for -usbdevice

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

[Qemu-devel] Re: Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0

[Anthony Liguori]

Juan Quintela wrote:
> Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>   
>> I haven't built/tested at all, but this is the set of patches I've
>> collected for the 0.12.0 release.  Will be testing tonight and
>> tomorrow and tagging probably around 5pm CST.  Will then upload the
>> release and announce once things are propagated.
>>
>> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for
>> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there.
>>
>> http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git stable-0.12
>>     
>
> My fdc changes to ease 0.11 -> 0.12 migration are also missing.
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/41188/
>
> This one is important because instance_id was changed, and there is no
> way to move from one instance_id to another at migration time.
>   

Sorry, there wasn't a FOR 0.12 so it went into the wrong bucket.

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori