From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLbKC-0004lo-Ed for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:48:48 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLbK7-0004gy-1H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:48:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53293 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NLbK6-0004gq-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:48:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50941) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NLbK6-0008Ap-HN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:48:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4B2B6C0A.8050808@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:48:26 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging tree updated with patches I'm considering for 0.12.0 References: <4B2AA847.3010003@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4B2B4617.3060702@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B2B4617.3060702@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 12/18/09 10:06, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >> If you have a pending patch that you think should be considered for >> 0.12.0, please check this tree and let me know if it's not there. > > Also missing: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/41172/ Oops, false alarm. That one is in. /me was looking at the wrong branch ... sorry, Gerd