* [Qemu-devel] stable-0.12 versus master branching?
@ 2009-12-20 11:48 Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-20 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-12-20 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, Anthony Liguori
I am really confused wrt stable 0.12 branching policy.
For example I see this, in master:
commit d587e0787153f0224a6140c5015609963ceaabfb
Author: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Dec 14 11:36:53 2009 -0600
Revert "pci: interrupt disable bit support"
This reverts commit 0ea5709a32085f7d14901a09d12bd35f9b267607.
Per discussion with Michael Tsirkin, this is too risky for 0.12
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
(this was cherry-picked in stable-0.12 as well).
>From the comment, this revert makes sense for stable-0.12
but not for master. Is this an attempt to keep stable and master
as close as possible? I expected master development to proceed while
stable-0.12 would get just bugfixes. No?
Thanks,
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: stable-0.12 versus master branching?
2009-12-20 11:48 [Qemu-devel] stable-0.12 versus master branching? Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2009-12-20 14:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 16:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2009-12-20 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: qemu-devel
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I am really confused wrt stable 0.12 branching policy.
> For example I see this, in master:
>
> commit d587e0787153f0224a6140c5015609963ceaabfb
> Author: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon Dec 14 11:36:53 2009 -0600
>
> Revert "pci: interrupt disable bit support"
>
> This reverts commit 0ea5709a32085f7d14901a09d12bd35f9b267607.
>
> Per discussion with Michael Tsirkin, this is too risky for 0.12
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>
> (this was cherry-picked in stable-0.12 as well).
> From the comment, this revert makes sense for stable-0.12
> but not for master. Is this an attempt to keep stable and master
> as close as possible? I expected master development to proceed while
> stable-0.12 would get just bugfixes. No?
>
It was a mistake. I've already got it recommitted in master. Just need
to push.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Thanks,
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: stable-0.12 versus master branching?
2009-12-20 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
@ 2009-12-21 16:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-12-21 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:35:53AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> I am really confused wrt stable 0.12 branching policy.
>> For example I see this, in master:
>>
>> commit d587e0787153f0224a6140c5015609963ceaabfb
>> Author: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>> Date: Mon Dec 14 11:36:53 2009 -0600
>>
>> Revert "pci: interrupt disable bit support"
>>
>> This reverts commit 0ea5709a32085f7d14901a09d12bd35f9b267607.
>>
>> Per discussion with Michael Tsirkin, this is too risky for 0.12
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>>
>> (this was cherry-picked in stable-0.12 as well).
>> From the comment, this revert makes sense for stable-0.12
>> but not for master. Is this an attempt to keep stable and master
>> as close as possible? I expected master development to proceed while
>> stable-0.12 would get just bugfixes. No?
>>
>
> It was a mistake. I've already got it recommitted in master. Just need
> to push.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> Thanks,
>>
I see. So I think we should revert
f9bf77dd1f838b0061172fe41709b221956da2f5
on stable-0.12 as well: interrupt disable and interrupt
status appeared in the same spec revision,
so it might surprise guests to see one but not the other.
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-21 16:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-20 11:48 [Qemu-devel] stable-0.12 versus master branching? Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-20 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-12-21 16:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).