From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpIV-0004yS-Ej for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:56:47 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpIQ-0004vv-TJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:56:46 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60256 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpIQ-0004vk-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:56:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22829) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRpIP-0006GF-CO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:56:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4B420FB3.2090309@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:56:35 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100104153642.GA13809@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100104153642.GA13809@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] qemu: properties for feature compatibility List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/04/10 16:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Here's what I came up with for solving the problem of differences in > features in virtio between 0.12 and 0.11. This also enables migration > between different backends, e.g. between host where tap supports virtio > net header and where it does not: management just needs to set features > appropriately. Looks good to me now. Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann cheers, Gerd