From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSFPo-0007Rp-FD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:50:04 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSFPj-0007PF-NP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:50:04 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40910 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSFPj-0007P4-CZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:49:59 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:36255)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <john.cooper@redhat.com>)
	id 1NSFPi-0003Ef-R8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:49:58 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <john.cooper@redhat.com>) id 1NS32F-0004Ft-EI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:36:55 -0500
Message-ID: <4B42D6FA.3020201@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:06:50 -0500
From: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4B2F19CC.5020808@redhat.com> <20091224130521.GD4781@amt.cnet>
In-Reply-To: <20091224130521.GD4781@amt.cnet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: john.cooper@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:46:36AM -0500, john cooper wrote:
>> +    {
>> +        .name = "Opteron_G2",
>> +        .level = 5,
>> +        .vendor1 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_1,
>> +        .vendor2 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_2,
>> +        .vendor3 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_3,
> 
> Silly question: why a CPU named "Opteron_G2" uses intel vendor id's?

The feedback I had from AMD indicated using the Intel
strings for a family 15 cpu resulted in the least
amount of guest confusion.  The upstream kvm64 model
does similarly.

Sorry for my late response here which was preempted
by the intervening holiday.

-john

-- 
john.cooper@redhat.com