From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSQqs-0005yJ-UJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:02:46 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSQqp-0005w0-0z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:02:46 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44447 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSQqo-0005vv-QM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:02:42 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1028)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1NSQqo-0001sN-6t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:02:42 -0500
Message-ID: <4B44439A.6060404@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:02:34 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4B2DF334.6030208@redhat.com>	<20091220155101.GB31257@redhat.com>	<4B2E49E5.6050709@redhat.com>	<20091220165612.GC31257@redhat.com>	<C9DA6F14-719C-49C2-A9B5-C74A64603026@suse.de>	<20091220171822.GD31257@redhat.com>	<20091220172341.GB21163@redhat.com>	<2162E312-0110-42E1-A391-D75A6F013554@suse.de>	<20091220173702.GC21163@redhat.com>	<4B2E660F.1050703@codemonkey.ws>	<20091221074355.GU4490@redhat.com>	<4B2F31B1.6040403@redhat.com>
	<4B30EFDF.4060202@codemonkey.ws> <4B42D6E3.70200@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B42D6E3.70200@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, dlaor@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On 01/05/2010 07:06 AM, john cooper wrote:
>> >  Nehalem is really just a code name.  Would it be better to use core-i7?
> I'd inquired whether marketing sanctioned names existed but
> didn't receive anything conclusive.  The resulting monikers
> at least are in common usage.

Unfortunately it goes on a case-by-case basis.  Nobody is talking about 
Willamette anymore, but the Prescott moniker is still with us.

Paolo