From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSwgn-0008Fi-DG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:02:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSwgi-0008DW-RS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:02:28 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56952 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSwgi-0008DM-Ei for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:02:24 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:18398) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSwgh-000839-9l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:02:23 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f223.google.com ([209.85.217.223]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSwga-0004Qh-I0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:02:16 -0500 Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so21905807gxk.2 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:02:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B462199.2020902@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:02:01 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add KVM paravirt cpuid leaf References: <20100107124449.GY4905@redhat.com> <4B46072C.80909@codemonkey.ws> <20100107161503.GE4905@redhat.com> <4B46118A.9050101@codemonkey.ws> <4B46123F.7000501@redhat.com> <20100107170822.GB4537@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100107170822.GB4537@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/07/2010 11:08 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:56:31PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 01/07/2010 06:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> I don't want to deviate unnecessarily from qemu-kvm so we can >>> approach this in one of two ways. We can remove the guard in >>> qemu-kvm and Avi can send me a pull request with this feature. I >>> can also just pull in the patch as-is and we can fix this in both >>> places later. I'm happy either way. >>> >> Let's go through qemu-kvm.git. I'll post information about the >> queue policy soon. >> >> > Till yesterday it was other way around. Not qemu-kvm.git master, but a for_upstream branch that actually tracks qemu.git. The point is to get Avi involved in shaping the way kvm support in qemu.git evolves so that we can converge. > May be switch rules after > applying the patch? > Let's give Avi a chance to get his tree setup. We can revisit in a couple days if necessary. Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > Gleb. >