From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmei-0000pA-Ou for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:43:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmed-0000lN-1D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:43:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51449 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmec-0000lH-NT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:43:50 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f194.google.com ([209.85.221.194]:48747) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUmec-0006B2-Eh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:43:50 -0500 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so2605063qyk.4 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:43:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B4CD0F3.2050607@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:43:47 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Advise on updating SeaBIOS in stable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel , seabios@seabios.org, Kevin O'Connor Hi, I'm ready to cut another qemu stable release and I'm contemplating whether to update to 0.5.1 in stable. Generally speaking, we try to limit stable to bug fixes and changes that aren't user visible. 0.5.1 looks like a point on the master branch as opposed to a separate branch. I wonder what the thinking is within SeaBIOS about what sort of changes will be in the 0.5.x series vs. what would result in 0.6.0. Regards, Anthony Liguori