From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NUpIE-0000qv-QQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:32:54 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NUpIA-0000m2-Aj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:32:54 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38433 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUpIA-0000lz-52
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:32:50 -0500
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.148]:29454)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NUpI9-00041i-J0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:32:49 -0500
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 14so148789qwa.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B4CF88C.3050903@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:32:44 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1263230079.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<20100111171649.GB11936@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100111171649.GB11936@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH-RFC 01/13] virtio: export virtqueue
	structure
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/11/2010 11:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> vhost needs physical addresses for
> ring so expose that structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@redhat.com>
>    

I think accessor functions might make more sense.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori