From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVMvd-000562-RD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:27:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVMvY-0004y8-7v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:27:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41579 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVMvY-0004xv-1z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:27:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11538) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVMvX-0001zi-K5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:27:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4B4EF197.6050703@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:27:35 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B4CD0F3.2050607@codemonkey.ws> <20100113045148.GD12792@morn.localdomain> <4B4E5E2B.9080300@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4B4E5E2B.9080300@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] Advise on updating SeaBIOS in stable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Kevin O'Connor , seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel Hi, >> If you're looking to pull in 32bit pcibios support, then I don't think >> it would be worthwhile to rebase to a stable branch, as the 32bit >> pcibios support is easily the biggest user visible change in v0.5.1 >> (in the sense that Linux will call 32bit pcibios if it's available). > > Unless there's a strong demand for it, I'd like to hold off on 32bit > pcibios support. I think someone mentioned bochs-based pcbios in qemu 0.11 has 32bit pcibios support, so not having that in 0.12 would be a regression. Dunno how much this is a problem in practice though. cheers, Gerd