From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NVQjJ-0003gq-EQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:31:21 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NVQjE-0003eT-M6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:31:21 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33879 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVQjE-0003eN-GY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:31:16 -0500
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.148]:19964)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NVQjD-0006Gz-9x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:31:15 -0500
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 14so629152qwa.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B4F2AAE.5000501@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:31:10 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] add disk/cdrom version properties
References: <1263476654-7222-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1263476654-7222-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/14/2010 07:44 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>    Hi,
>
> This patch series makes the version reported by ide and scsi drives
> configurable using qdev properties.  Should help keeping the virtual
> hardware more constant on qemu updates, so it becomes less likely
> that Windows wants be re-activated.
>
> Maybe 0.12 candidate?
>    

Definitely, but is there really three patches?  I only see two.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> cheers,
>    Gerd
>
>
>
>
>