From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NXhYY-00039A-UI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:53:39 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NXhYU-00032k-Cs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:53:38 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46046 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NXhYT-000324-L9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:53:33 -0500
Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:57796)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NXhYT-0007fk-5P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:53:33 -0500
Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so6523715ewy.17
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B576D44.3070202@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:53:24 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models..
References: <4B549016.6090501@redhat.com> <4B560A88.9@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100119200349.GG3204@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
	<4B563144.9030803@codemonkey.ws> <4B576311.3030906@redhat.com>
	<20100120202634.GA20754@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100120202634.GA20754@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Przywara,
	Andre" <Andre.Przywara@amd.com>

On 01/20/2010 02:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> To be honest all possible naming schemes for '-cpu<name>' are just as
> unfriendly as each other. The only user friendly option is '-cpu host'.
>
> IMHO, we should just pick a concise naming scheme&  document it. Given
> they are all equally unfriendly, the one that has consistency with vmware
> naming seems like a mild winner.
>    

IIUC, VMware uses "Group A, Group B", etc. which is pretty close to 
saying Family 10h IMHO.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Daniel
>