From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZWDz-0005XG-IJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:11:55 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZWDu-0005Vj-En
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:11:54 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58255 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZWDu-0005Vg-97
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:11:50 -0500
Received: from mail-iw0-f188.google.com ([209.85.223.188]:41203)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NZWDu-0003Fc-3V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:11:50 -0500
Received: by iwn26 with SMTP id 26so3890816iwn.14
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:11:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B5E0912.7090904@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:11:46 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1263230079.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<20100111172326.GB12084@redhat.com>
	<4B5DF7D0.7050609@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100125202711.GA16928@redhat.com>
	<4B5E0660.6010400@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100125210513.GD16928@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100125210513.GD16928@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH-RFC 13/13] virtio-net: connect to vhost net
	backend
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/25/2010 03:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> it *has* an int:
> 	struct EventNotifier {
> 		int fd;
> 	};
>    

Yes, this would be a lot better.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori