From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZl0J-0000Xy-BP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:58:47 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZl0E-0000V4-Kt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:58:47 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51741 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZl0E-0000Ut-EB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:58:42 -0500
Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:50863)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1NZl0E-0005lz-0P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:58:42 -0500
Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com
	[9.17.195.228])
	by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0QCqYsQ008945
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:52:34 -0700
Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245])
	by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	o0QCwXlC113206
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:58:33 -0700
Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP
	id o0QD0fD1018424
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:00:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4B5EE6F8.7040502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:58:32 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] win32: use PRId64 instead of %lld
References: <1264368221-3040-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org>
	<20100125100905.GA9019@redhat.com>
	<20100125120348.461ce622@doriath>
	<m3k4v6s14m.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<20100125132719.23a483cf@doriath>
	<20100125153838.GB11161@redhat.com>
	<20100126094329.70719b6f@doriath>
	<4B5EE450.9090004@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20100126124642.GB19036@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100126124642.GB19036@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Herve Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

On 01/26/2010 06:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Yes, I agree we are comnpliant.
> But I also think we should be strict and reject non-JSON
> input just so that clients do not come to depend on it.
>    

If we can make JSON better while preserving compatibility and adhering 
to the spec, why wouldn't we?

For instance, at some point in time, we're going to do have to do 
something about floating point representation.  We have the ability to 
negotiate these capabilities at run-time.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori