From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:13:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5EF874.3080306@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5EED22.4080009@redhat.com>
On 01/26/2010 07:24 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 03:18 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> The main question is where does it belong?
>>
>> a) built into qemu
>> b) built as separate tool, but shipped with qemu
>> c) completely separate
>>
>> I'm personally leaning towards a. That way we can reuse the detection
>> code and give help when an option is used that doesn't work.
>>
>
> Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the
> topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to
> integrate that functionality as well).
I'm not sure I agree. It would use no code from qemu and really benefit
in no way from being part of qemu. I don't feel that strongly about it
though.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 6:49 [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Jan 26 Chris Wright
2010-01-26 9:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
2010-01-26 13:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-26 13:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-26 13:18 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-26 13:24 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-26 13:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-01-26 13:37 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-26 13:45 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-26 14:13 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-01-26 14:15 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-26 14:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-26 14:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-26 14:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-26 14:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-26 14:42 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-26 14:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-26 14:50 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-26 14:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-26 14:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-26 14:44 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B5EF874.3080306@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).