From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZmMw-0007x1-Vp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:26:15 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NZmMr-0007sc-UM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:26:14 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38537 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZmMr-0007sS-PX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:26:09 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31506)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1NZmMr-0000x6-9Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:26:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4B5EFB7A.7010709@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:26:02 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20100126064902.GD25779@x200.localdomain>
	<03EA8701-C607-4B87-A6C6-1DCD3E5DCAAC@suse.de>
	<4B5EE9EF.6030904@codemonkey.ws>
	<197BDDDF-D808-4157-8270-42B72B99BE0D@suse.de>
	<4B5EED22.4080009@redhat.com> <4B5EF874.3080306@codemonkey.ws>
	<4B5EF903.1070508@redhat.com> <4B5EFAB6.4080102@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4B5EFAB6.4080102@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/26/2010 04:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 08:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 01/26/2010 04:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the 
>>>> topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to 
>>>> integrate that functionality as well).
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I agree.  It would use no code from qemu and really 
>>> benefit in no way from being part of qemu.  I don't feel that 
>>> strongly about it though.
>>>
>>
>> It would need to know which cpuid bits qemu supports.  Only qemu 
>> knows that.
>
> I'm not sure I understand why.  Can you elaborate?
>

If qemu doesn't recognize -cpu qemu64,+nx, then no amount of hardware 
and kvm.ko support will allow the user to enable nx in a guest.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function